Though this will only further mess up the post numbering system Blogsome has, I really would like to pop in and say a few things so that this blog has an actual proper post.
So the current song running through my head is 10538 Overture by Electric Light Orchestra. It was featured at the end of what is probably my favorite episode of Life on Mars. Life on Mars is a great show—the wonderful marriage of sci-fi and cop show. And John Simm (who plays main character Sam Tyler) is oddly attractive. He shouldn’t be, but he is. It boggles my mind.
SPOILER! coming up:
The ending of the show still has me reeling. On the one hand, what the FUCK, the whole two series, Sam is trying to return to the future; he struggles so hard, begging the doctors, Maya, his mother, anyone to keep him alive while he fights in his head. And then he fucking commits suicide to go back to fantasyland where you have Gene Hunt to beat up the uncooperative detainees and sweet Annie Cartwright to cuddle. I know he was in a coma, but this change of heart didn’t seem believable. Part of what made Sam was his determination. Letting him kill himself just shits on that. And Sam seems to care deeply about his mother, yet he goes off and abandons her even though she was the one who insisted the doctors keep him on life support. On that point, we may be arguing taste, though, because I’m just really annoyed at how ungrateful Sam was for jumping off a bloody building.
On the other, his life in 1973 is probably infinitely more colorful, rich, and rewarding, even if it is fake. When Sam returns to 2006 (or 2007?), the world is gray and tied up in paperwork and procedure and he hasn’t even got Maya anymore. And I’d be lying if I wasn’t initially kind of happy that Sam was to reunite with his past chums; I like Gene and Annie and everyone else in Manchester because I got to know their personalities; everyone in the future was largely anonymous. I think generally, though, despite my frustration, the ending is really good. It got me excited, made me think and offered a lot of ideas to toy with, and left me with warm fuzzies.
END SPOILS!
Anyway, out on the old Blog-City blog, I had a post in draft mode all about me entertaining ideas of sex. The short and sweet of it is that I sometimes wonder if I’m asexual. I simply cannot imagine myself engaging in the act. I like the way an orgasm feels, but all the attendant conditions to achieve that state when another person is involved put me off.
And these notions of sex were brought about by what I think is a nascent relationship with a boy. Oh, yes, it is in a primordial state, but I have mentioned this person before in my blog. Goodness, that means it’s been on super-slow brew since my first year of college! From what I have gleaned in conversation with him, he is about as clueless and inexperienced as I am. And I don’t think I’m helping things because my signals are incredibly mixed. Largely because I don’t know what to think myself. In many ways he and I are similar, which is something I value a lot, but I still feel incredibly hesitant to push things forward! The first reason is shallow: he is too short. I think he’s about my height or shorter. I had sort of conceived long ago that my ideal partner would not be shorter than myself. I am five-foot-two or five-foot-three, which is quite short, so someone shorter than I am is incredibly short…it would look weird. There’s other reasons, too, but I’m getting all addled having to admit anything. I’ll just rattle off a list, lavish explanation can come later. So: he’s pervy (enjoys porn quite a bit), I would hear no end of it from our mutual acquaintances in the college, seems incredibly money-oriented (wants a high-paying, potentially soulless job), fiscally conservative, Christian, physically I am not his ideal of a female, he’s trying to bodybuild (man titties, muscle or fat, are not okay), skateboards (I know that’s a totally stupid gripe, but I am being completely honest here), and that’s about it so far. Oh, wait, he drinks. Ugh.
What I am essentially saying, then, is that he does not conform with my notion of perfect. And as much as perfect is a fool’s pursuit, knowing all the above cons, it is hard for me to be attracted to him, at least not in the way of previous boys I have found charming. Perhaps, then, what I am seeing is the division between infatuation and reality. But that just leads to me wondering why reality has to be such a piece of shit for me. Yes, that is an exaggeration considering well, everything, but I’m just terribly jealous of all those lovey-dovey people who seemed to have found the person whom their red string leads to.
But there’s still a month of summer left, so there is a scrap of time to sort some things out.
On to a topic which causes me considerably less consternation:
Have been reading Michael Palin’s Diaries while I wait around for timers to go off at work. I am conflicted. A lot of the entries make extensive mention of weather or food/drink, which is starting to wear me down (the book covers 1969-1979, and I’m at the end of 1976). The political/local issues are more interesting though sometimes dry or confusing (when I’m not familiar with what he’s referring to). The inter-Python stuff is good, but during the years Flying Circus was actually being made (which is what I was really hoping to get a glimpse into), show entries are rather sparse. Cute people stories (particularly Michael’s behavior to others, especially friends and family) were hoped for, too, but you tend to get more of a laundry list of people he interacted with that day without much detail of what was said or felt. You do get Mike’s opinion of people, but there aren’t really specifics so the opinions as is aren’t especially convincing or interesting. And, sadly for me, some of my "Aww, Michael’s so darling!" feeling has faded after the parts I’ve been through. Being that it’s his diary, there is quite a fair bit of grousing, and reading so much of it at once makes him seem rather sour. I suppose I had had him up on a pedestal. Disappointing, but the truth is preferable to delusion.
Funnily enough, at least from the snatches he writes of Terry Jones, I am now quite fond of TJ! I’d always heard that he was the one arguing with Cleese about money vs. art, but it wasn’t until I read Diaries that I got that romantic artist hero vibe. Being that TJ and MP seem so close, though, I doubt MP would be shitting on his friend’s image, but still! I at least appreciate him better.
Despite Michael’s fall from idol object, I hope he keeps issuing his diaries. One, I want to see what alterations in temperament or whatever occur as he gets older. Two, there are projects I’d like to hear about—how shooting for Brazil went, for instance. I hope there is expansion on what is available in the books that go along with his travel shows, too. Right now I’m watching Around the World in Eighty Days and it’d be nice to see more personal information than what can be seen on screen or was left out of the book.
I feel a little bit like a stalker or gossip whore, being so interested in his intimate matters.